During
the electioneering campaign of General Muhammadu Buhari, I carefully monitored
his style of campaign utterances and politicking. When he took over, I was keen
in observing how he was to start piloting the affairs of a battered country. Nigeria
was a country on the verge of total collapse. Crooks, rogues and rabble rousers
had put the country in the reverse gear and shamelessly celebrated bogus ‘achievements’.
Transformation Agenda was a mockery of good governance. The agenda only
transformed criminals in the corridors of power to super-rich vandals now threatening
national progress with filthy lucre.
I
took time to brush up on my readings and understanding of Development – not so
much on developmental stories of particular countries, but mostly on the broad
issues of development: why some countries succeed and others, although blessed,
fail. I read, re-read, and looked up reviews and commentaries and concluded
that in most of the literature I read, authored by renowned scholars and
respected columnists of various newspapers, etc, each offered in profound
thoughts on the question that is most important to Nigeria of today – the
question whether Nigerians are prepared to make the required sacrifices for a
successful Nigeria or a failed Nigeria. Altogether, the summary of my studies
and thoughts of the authors is that Nigerians can make their country succeed
brilliantly and it has all it takes to make the country fail disastrously as resisted
in the chased away Jonathan administration adjudged as inept, sadistic and
clueless.
Therefore,
the choice is entirely in our hands to make or mar. PDP chose disaster for
Nigeria for 16 years while APC chose a change from the old order as publicly
declared by Honourable Speaker of the House of Representatives, Yakubu Dogara,
during one of his visits to commiserate with internally displaced persons (IDPs)
at their camps spread across the country.
Needless
to say, various factors beyond human power are important – factors such as
geographical advantages or hardships, ethnicity, ethnic culture and history,
availability or non-availability of natural resources, a country’s
ethnic/cultural homogeneity or diversity, religious homogeneity or diversity,
etc. But, in the final analysis, the
ultimate determinant of whether a country shall succeed or not is the choice of
its people, the institutions they set up, and the integrity or otherwise of the
operation of those institutions.
For
instance, being located in a desert, swampy or riverine area makes some
development initiatives difficult most times but not impossible. The state of
Israel is located in the desert but from good leadership and followership, it
developed to one of the most agriculturally and technologically productive
countries in the world. Having two or more different nationalities (each with
its own homeland) in a country makes stability and development difficult but
not impossible. Switzerland has less than four nationalities, but it is one of
the most stable and richest in the world. Being richly endowed with human and natural
resources is good development but it does not guarantee physical development
unless with good leadership. Nigeria is one of the richest countries in human
and natural resources in the world but it has been relentlessly retarding, with
the masses of its people becoming poorer and poorer each second without a clear
direction. They key - the secret - in each case is the choices made by the
people and their loyalty to those choices, and the institutions they give their
country. Some past state governors in Nigeria are alleged to be richer than their
states. Some present state governors are wolves in sheep skin. Some criminally
believe their victories at the elections is a shortest route to quick riches
vide stealing of public funds and other clever ways of over-invoicing, contract
variations and award of lucrative contracts to friends, fronts and relations with
the connivance of sycophantic and hypocritical civil servants.
In
short, Nigeria started declining since the unforgiveable days of the Jonathan
era and becoming less and less stable, with over 80 percent of its people living
in abject poverty, starvation and misery because of wrong choices, wrong
institutions and denying integrity to the institutions. Of course, the biggest
of the wrong institutions is the federal government. Essentially, because
Nigeria has hundreds of ethnic nationalities and the best choice is federal
structure. Since some of the nationalities are large and some small, the best
arrangement is to make each of the large nationalities a state and, with
caution and respect, the small contiguous nationalities also joined to form
reasonable sustainable states. While doing that, Nigeria ought to have borne in
mind the danger of having too many states and too many state governments – and
thereby putting too heavy a load on administrative costs. (India, with a
population of over one billion people, carefully carved itself into 28 states,
and transferred most of the burden of development to the state governments).
Unfortunately,
it suited the selfish interests of our most influential policy makers to carve
Nigeria into smaller and smaller states so as to transfer more powers,
resources and assets to federal centre. That wrong policy paved the way for
Nigeria’s horrific inefficiency, ineptitude and corruption at the centre,
turned the states into impotent entities as governors now turned the local
governments impotent forever, both at the mercy of the federal centre,
destroyed most development energy at the state and local government levels, and
plunged the country into deeper and deeper poverty.
The
old regional responsibilities and assets (like universities, export crops
management, some crucial highways, control over schools and schools curriculum,
etc) that were transferred to the federal centre mostly floundered, declined
and perished. For instance, assets of the former regional government of
Northern Nigeria such as Bank of the North, Northern Nigeria Marketing Board, Broadcasting
Corporation of Northern Nigeria (BCNN), New Nigerian Newspapers, etc., could not
be managed by successive northern state governments on creation. The
investments have perished to eternity.
Those
in control of the federal centre arrogated to themselves the prerogative of
deciding who rules the states and the states decide who rules the local
governments; and election rigging by federal and state agencies (INEC, SIEC, Police,
DSS, Military and Civil Defence) became part of the political culture,
ostensibly to hoist unpopular politicians for hidden agenda. Federal agencies
like the Central Bank of Nigeria, as well as the state and local governments,
all lost integrity. Leadership whims, caprices, and impunity ruled over the
country. Nigerians ceased having a country worth the name. Most observers began
to say that Nigeria was a failed state that somehow kept standing and breathing
- a failed state that could have since crumbled if not for the timely election
of Muhammadu Buhari, few state governors and other agents of change in 2015 to
rescue.
In
their electioneering campaign for election, Buhari and Osinbajo promised
Nigerians CHANGE, and Nigerians trusted them with most of their votes. In spite
of all the difficulties confronting the beginning of their presidency, most
Nigerians still trust them and are hopeful to see real change. Understandably, they
started by focusing attention on the war against corruption. That was a good
step because most Nigerians strongly desire to see corruption wiped out from
the land with lightning speed.
Speaker
Dogara has said, “Part of the change Nigerians will witness is total war
against bribery and corruption. APC is determined to restore the lost glory of
Nigeria no matter whose ox may be gored. We abandoned PDP for the safety of
Nigeria and, with support, we shall succeed and smile”.
Buhari’s
former stint at ruling Nigeria in 1983 – 1985, and his general reputation and
body language, fuels the anti-corruption expectations. But, hopefully, Buhari
understands that to crush corruption fully and abidingly in Nigeria that was
institutionalised for decades, Nigerians must reorder and revamp the institutional
roots and fabrics of their country. The wrongly chosen, distorted and corrupted
institutions are the root of the country’s palaver and some are still in the
system. If we redraw, restructure, and straighten up our institutions, not only
will corruption perish, the whole country will also begin to rise again.
It
needs to be emphasized that even if Nigerians decisively crush corruption,
Nigeria can still continue to decline – and can decline until it crumbles if the
leadership is poor. Whether Nigeria revives and survives, or whether it
continues to decline until it perishes depend on the choices made in the next
couple of years under Buhari’s leadership. That means Buhari can lead in ways
that continue the decline or the success. For instance, he is at liberty to
choose to revive and reinforce the ambition of a selected few, reinforce the
accumulation of power, assets and resource-control in the hands of his federal
government, and even make the states more in number and weaker in stature – for
instance, adopt the insane proposal that the number of states be jumped to 54!
PMB
could, out of ‘loyalty’ to those senseless agitators, tutored in the culture of
election manipulation and savagery, support the senselessness if he so wishes.
He is at liberty for now to do all or any of those and more – and pave the path
to Nigeria’s ultimate collapse and disappearance from the world map. But he
could guide and lead Nigerians in totally different ways, and give Nigeria a
new lease of life. He could champion a movement for rational federation, and
for the devolution of powers to the federating units. He could thereby revive
the productive and developmental energies of various sections of Nigeria – and
make the country a land of development, progress and hope again. To build or
kill Nigeria, it is the choice of Nigerians.
A few
months ago, the President wondered aloud why it is his lot to come and lead
Nigeria at this tough and rough time – when the treasury was virtually empty;
when the main source of national revenue (crude oil) is fearfully weakening in
the world; when Nigeria’s economy looks as if it is heading for total collapse,
etc. I believe Nigeria is fortunate to have a disciplined leader like Buhari at
the helm at this critical time – a man who has the courage to turn the country
onto the path that most other leaders seriously opposed but which Nigeria desperately
needs to heal. Will Buhari then do the things that Nigeria really needs to
survive and head to prosper? Yes, he can but with total support and unalloyed
loyalty of Nigerians. He urgently needs the promised support of Senator Bukola
Saraki (the Senate president) and Speaker Dogara. His Lordship, the Chief
Justice of Nigeria, Her Lordship, the President of the Federal Court of Appeal,
other ministers in the temple of justice, ICPC Chairman, Code of Conduct
Tribunal chairman and Ibrahim Magu of the EFCC need not to be told to join the wagon
of support against gangsters, tricksters, fraudsters and treasury thieves and
their clearing agents for Buhari to succeed. EFCC and ICPC should re-strategize
to fish out other criminals still making noise and roaming the streets with
shoulders high. They are clumsy, stink of corruption and are saboteurs to
national development. They deserve to join their ancestors wherever they may be
for Nigeria to bounce back to glory.
No comments:
Post a Comment